PROMESS
What it found
The main measure did not show a significant benefit.
“Primary endpoint: the hazard ratio for EDSS deterioration in the CPM in comparison with the MP group was 0.61 [95% CI: 0·31-1·22](p = 0·16).”Read by software from the paper's abstract
hazard ratio 0.61
p = 0.16
Total participants: 138
Read by software from the paper's abstract
What was tested
Treatment tested
- Cyclophosphamide anhydrous
Compared with
- Methylprednisolone
Glucocorticoid receptor agonist
What it measured
Main measures
Delay to disability deterioration as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS: 0.5 or 1 point increase, depending on baseline score)
every 4 weeks for one year, then every 8 weeks for one year
Disability progression
Other measures (6)
Proportion of patients with disability deterioration (EDSS: 0.5 or 1 point increase, depending on baseline score)
every month during one year then every two months during the 2nd year
Disability progressionMultiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) and the Z scores of MSFC three components
Visit number 1, 2, 13(at one year),19 (at two years) and 20 (last visit)
Disability progressionNumber of MS relapses
all along the follow up period
RelapsesProportion of patients with adverse events and delay of occurrence of adverse events
all along the follow up period
SafetyQuality of life questionnaires
visit 2, 13(at one year) and 19 (at two years)
Quality of life (reported by participants)Disability self-assessment questionnaires
visite 2, 13 et 19
Who could take part
Progressive MS · 18 to 65
Inclusion Criteria: * Multiple sclerosis (MS) subjects (Mc Donald et al criteria), * Aged 18 to 65 * Diagnosis of secondary progressive MS ( Lublin and Reingold criteria) * Progressive deterioration phase of at least 6 months and less than 4 years. * Reduction of walking capacity and increase EDSS not ascribed to consequence of relapses (at least 0.5 point) in the last 12 months * EDSS between 4.0 and 6.5 included * Female participating must use contraceptives while on study drug * Written informed consent * Patient protected by French social security system Exclusion Criteria: * Others diseases interfering with MS or treatment * Recent history (within the previous 2 years) of drug or alcohol abuse. * Patients with psychiatric illnesses who are unable to provide written, informed consent prior to any testing under this protocol * Hemorrhagic cystitis * Pregnant or lactating women * Known allergy at cyclophosphamide, corticoids and in particular methylprednisolone * Persistent infectious diseases * Patients with bladder permanent catheterization * Known history of cardiac arrhythmia after methylprednisolone intravenous treatment * Abnormal screening/baseline blood tests exceeding any of the limits defined below : Hb \< 9g/dl or Total white blood cell count less than 3 000/mm3 or lymphocytes count less than 900/ mm3 or Platelet count less than 125 000/mm3 * Gastric or duodenal ulcer in evolution * Gut diverticulosis * Diabetes mellitus * Known history of active hepatitis (ASAT >3 X ULN) * Known history of renal failure (creatinine level > 180 µmol/L) * Psychosis * Current or past (\< 3 months) participation in another drug trial * Prior use of cyclophosphamide, lymphoid irradiation, monoclonal antibodies anti CD4 or anti CD52 or anti-VLA-4 therapies, cladribine ou cyclosporine A * Other clinical types of MS : Secondary progressive phase evolving for more than 4 years ; Remittent type of MS without progression between relapses ; Primary progressive type of MS * Use of interferon beta, methotrexate or imurel in the month prior to study. * Treatment with intravenous monthly corticoids in the year prior to study. * Treatment with corticoids (3 to 5 days) in the 2 month prior to study.
As registered. Criteria can change, so ask the trial team or your neurologist.
About this trial
In the sponsor's words
Preliminary not-controlled clinical studies of the efficacy of monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide administration in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis reported encouraging results, but no randomized controlled trial has been conducted so far. The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of IV cyclophosphamide as compared to IV methylprednisolone administered every 4 weeks during 1 year and every 8 weeks during 1 year, on the delay to confirmed disability deterioration as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. The secondary objectives are to evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy at 2 years on the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), the percentage of patients with disability deterioration (EDSS) and the number of relapses. An intention-to-treat statistical analysis will be carried out.
Papers
Results
Double-Blind Controlled Randomized Trial of Cyclophosphamide versus Methylprednisolone in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.PLoS One · 2017
Primary endpoint: the hazard ratio for EDSS deterioration in the CPM in comparison with the MP group was 0.61 [95% CI: 0·31-1·22](p = 0·16).
Read by software from the paper's abstract
Loading reviews and guidelines…
Related trials
- IDP-023 g-NK Cells Plus Ocrelizumab in Patients With Prog…
Phase 1 · Paused
Still running
- STEMS2
Phase 2 · Recruiting
Still running
- A Study of KYV-101, a CD19 CAR T Cell Therapy, in Partici…
Phase 1 · Running, not recruiting
Still running
- Hydroxychloroquine and Indapamide in SPMS
Phase 2 · Status unknown
No result found
- STOP-I-SEP
Phase 3 · Running, not recruiting
Still running
- Hydroxychloroquine in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
Phase 2 · Completed
Result in a paper, not read yet
History
Started
Dec 2005
Main results due
Mar 2010
Finished
Mar 2012
Assembled by software from public sources and not checked by people. Each record links to its source. Report an error