Hematopoietic Stem Cell Therapy for Inflammatory MS
What it found
Results are posted in the registry, but without a statistical test of the main measure. See the numbers below.
What was tested
Treatment tested
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Therapy
Compared with
- Standard treatment with a conventional drug
- Natalizumab
Integrin alpha-4/beta-1 inhibitor|Integrin alpha-4/beta-7 inhibitor
- Fingolimod
- Dimethyl fumarate
Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 inhibitor
Results by group
Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Improvement
Pre Treatment, 6 and 12 months Post Treatment
| Group | Value | Interval | Number analysed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation | 3.4 units on a scale | 1.2 (Standard Deviation) | 52 |
| Standard Therapy for MS | 3.3 units on a scale | 1 (Standard Deviation) | 54 |
| Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation | 2.5 units on a scale | 1.4 (Standard Deviation) | 52 |
| Standard Therapy for MS | 3.7 units on a scale | 1.5 (Standard Deviation) | 54 |
| Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation | 2.4 units on a scale | 1.4 (Standard Deviation) | 52 |
| Standard Therapy for MS | 4 units on a scale | 1.7 (Standard Deviation) | 54 |
Values as posted on ClinicalTrials.gov. Outcomes measured differently across trials are not directly comparable.
Safety
| Group | Participants at risk | Serious adverse events | Deaths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation | 52 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 |
| Standard Therapy for MS | 55 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 |
As posted on ClinicalTrials.gov. Serious adverse events include any serious health event during the trial, whether or not the treatment caused it.
What it measured
Main measures
Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Improvement
Pre Treatment, 6 and 12 months Post Treatment
Disability progressionDisease progression, defined as a 1-point increase in the EDSS on consecutive evaluations at least 6 months apart and not due to a non-MS disease process. Patients will be followed for 5 years after randomization.
Disability progression
Who could take part
MS (type not specified) · 18 to 55
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age between18-55, inclusive. 2. Diagnosis of MS using revised McDonald criteria of clinically definite MS (Appendix I). 3. An EDSS score of 2.0 to 6.0 (Appendix II). 4. Inflammatory disease despite treatment with standard disease modifying therapy including at least 6 months of interferon or copaxone. Inflammatory disease is defined based on both MRI (gadolinium enhancing lesions) and clinical activity (acute relapses *treated with IV or oral high dose corticosteroids and prescribed by a neurologist). Minimum disease activity required for failure is defined as: a) two or more *steroid treated clinical relapses with documented new objective signs on neurological examination documented by a neurologist within the year prior to the study, or b) one *steroid treated clinical relapse within the year prior to study and evidence on MRI of active inflammation (i.e., gadolinium enhancement) within the last 12 months on an occasion separate from the clinical relapse (3 months before or after the clinical relapse). * A steroid treated relapse will include a relapse that was severe enough to justify treatment but due to patient intolerance of steroids, or a history of non-response to steroids, they were offered but not used. Exclusion Criteria** 1. Any illness that in the opinion of the investigators would jeopardize the ability of the patient to tolerate aggressive chemotherapy. 2. Prior history of malignancy except localized basal cell, squamous skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix. Other malignancies for which the patient is judged to be cured, such as head and neck cancer, or breast cancer will be considered on an individual basis. 3. Positive pregnancy test 4. Inability or unwillingness to pursue effective means of birth control from the time of evaluation for eligibility until 6 months posttransplant (if on transplant) or until appropriate for non-transplant treatment (if on control arm). Effective birth control is defined as 1) abstinence defined as refraining from all acts of vaginal intercourse; 2) consistent use of birth control pills; 3) injectable birth control methods (Depo-provera, Norplant); 4) tubal sterilization or male partner who has undergone vasectomy; 5) placement of an intrauterine device (IUD); or 6) use, with every act of intercourse, of diaphragm with contraceptive jelly and/or condoms with contraceptive foam. 5. Failure to willingly accept or comprehend irreversible sterility as a side effect of therapy 6. Forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) / forced vital capacity (FVC) \< 60% of predicted after bronchodilator therapy (if necessary) 7. Diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) \< 50% of predicted (for the transplant arm) 8. Resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 50 % 9. Bilirubin > 2.0 mg/dl 10. Serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl 11. Known hypersensitivity to mouse, rabbit, or E. Coli derived proteins, or to iron compounds/medications 12. Presence of metallic objects implanted in the body that would preclude the ability of the patient to safely have MRI exams 13. Diagnosis of primary progressive MS 14. Diagnosis of secondary progressive MS 15. Platelet count \< 100,000/ul, white blood cell count (WBC) \< 1,500 cells/mm3 16. Psychiatric illness, mental deficiency or cognitive dysfunction making compliance with treatment or informed consent impossible 17. Active infection except asymptomatic bacteriuria 18. Use of natalizumab (Tysabri) within the previous 6 months 19. Use of fingolimod (Gilenya) within the previous 3 months 20. Use of teriflunomide (Aubagio) within the previous 2 years unless cleared from the body (plasma concentration \< 0.02mcg/ml) following elimination from the body with cholestyramine 8g three times a day for 11 days 21. Prior treatment with CAMPATH (alemtuzumab) 22. Prior treatment with mitoxantrone 23. Any hereditary neurological disease such as Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) or Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) are contraindications 24. Use of tecfidera within the previous 3 months * For patients who clearly have inflammatory disease, an exception can be made if agreed upon by study PI and at least two study neurologists.
As registered. Criteria can change, so ask the trial team or your neurologist.
About this trial
In the sponsor's words
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is at onset an immune-mediated demyelinating disease. In most cases, it starts as a relapsing-remitting disease with distinct attacks and no symptoms between flares. Over years or decades, virtually all cases transition into a progressive disease in which insidious and slow neurologic deterioration occurs with or without acute flares. Relapsing-remitting disease is often responsive to immune suppressive or modulating therapies, while immune based therapies are generally ineffective in patients with a progressive clinical course. This clinical course and response to immune suppression, as well as neuropathology and neuroimaging studies, suggest that disease progression is associated with axonal atrophy. Disability correlates better with measures of axonal atrophy than immune mediated demyelination. Therefore, immune based therapies, in order to be effective, need to be started early in the disease course while MS is predominately an immune-mediated and inflammatory disease. While current immune based therapies delay disability, no intervention has been proven to prevent progressive disability. We propose, as a randomized study, autologous unmanipulated PBSCT using a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) versus FDA approved standard of care (i.e. interferon, glatiramer acetate, mitoxantrone, natalizumab, fingolimod, or tecfidera) in patients with inflammatory (relapsing) MS despite treatment with alternate approved therapy.
Papers
Results
Effect of Nonmyeloablative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation vs Continued Disease-Modifying Therapy on Disease Progression in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA · 2019
Results
Burman J, Fransson M, Totterman TH, Fagius J, Mangsbo SM, Loskog AS. T-cell responses after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for aggressive relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Immunology. 2013 Oct;140(2):211-9. doi: 10.1111/imm.12129.
Loading reviews and guidelines…
Related trials
- TDM-MS
Phase 4 · Status unknown
No result found
- CLADRI_NET
Phase 4 · Withdrawn
Stopped early
- STATURE
Status unknown
No result found
- Physical and Cognitive Performance During the Two First Y…
Completed
Result in a paper, not read yet
- ProgramMS
Status unknown
Result in a paper, not read yet
- Observational Study of a Novel Peri Infusion Regimen on t…
Completed
No result found
History
Started
Nov 2005
Main results due
Jan 2017
Finished
Aug 2019
Results posted
Aug 2020
Assembled by software from public sources and not checked by people. Each record links to its source. Report an error