FREEDOMS II
What it found
The main measure showed a statistically significant benefit.
“Mean annualised relapse rate was 0·40 (95% CI 0·34-0·48) in patients given placebo and 0·21 (0·17-0·25) in patients given fingolimod 0·5 mg: rate ratio 0·52 (95% CI 0·40-0·66; p<0·0001), corresponding to a reduction of 48% with fingolimod 0·5 mg versus placebo.”Read by software from the paper's abstract
Annualised relapse rate at month 24 · 24 months
| Group | n | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | 355 | 0.40 (95% CI 0.34-0.48) |
| Fingolimod 0·5 mg | 358 | 0.21 (0.17-0.25) |
rate ratio 0.52
p = <0.0001
Total participants: 1083
Read by software from the paper's abstract
What was tested
Treatment tested
Placebo or sham
- Placebo
Results by group
Aggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Estimate up to Month 24
24 months
| Group | Value | Interval | Number analysed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fingolimod 1.25 mg | 0.203 relapses per year | 0.165–0.249 | 370 |
| Fingolimod 0.5 mg | 0.208 relapses per year | 0.17–0.254 | 358 |
| Placebo | 0.403 relapses per year | 0.342–0.475 | 355 |
Fingolimod 1.25 mg
Fingolimod 0.5 mg
Placebo
Values as posted on ClinicalTrials.gov. Outcomes measured differently across trials are not directly comparable.
Safety
| Group | Participants at risk | Serious adverse events | Deaths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core: Fingolimod 1.25 mg | 370 | 53 (14.3%) | |
| Core: Fingolimod 0.5 mg | 358 | 53 (14.8%) | |
| Core: Placebo | 355 | 45 (12.7%) | |
| Extension: Fingolimod 1.25 mg | 308 | 27 (8.8%) | |
| Extension: Fingolimod 0.5 mg | 324 | 21 (6.5%) |
As posted on ClinicalTrials.gov. Serious adverse events include any serious health event during the trial, whether or not the treatment caused it.
What it measured
Main measures
Aggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Estimate up to Month 24
24 months
Disability progressionRelapses
Other measures (10)
Aggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Estimate up to End of Study
From Baseline until end of study (up to approximately 54 months).
Disability progressionRelapsesPercent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume
Baseline, Month 24 and end of study (up to approximately 54 months)
MRI lesionsBrain volume lossNumber of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Lesions
From Baseline until Month 48
MRI lesionsNumber of Gadolinium-enhanced T1 Lesions
Month 24 and end of study (up to approximately 54 months)
MRI lesionsChange From Baseline in Lesion Volume at Month 24 (Core Phase)
Baseline and Month 24
MRI lesionsPercentage of Participants Free of 3-month Confirmed Disability Progression at Month 24 and End of Study
24 months and end of study (up to approximately 54 months)
Disability progressionPercentage of Participants Free of 6-month Confirmed Disability Progression at Month 24 and End of Study
24 months and end of study (up to approximately 54 months)
Disability progressionPercentage of Participants Relapse-free up to Month 24
24 months
RelapsesPercentage of Participants Relapse-free up to End of Study
From Baseline until the end of study (up to approximately 54 months)
RelapsesChange From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Z-score
Baseline, Month 24 and end of study (up to approximately 54 months)
Disability progressionThinking and memoryWalking and mobilityArm and hand function
Who could take part
Relapsing MS · 18 to 55
Inclusion Criteria: * Male and female patients between ages 18-55 with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis * Patients with a relapsing-remitting disease course * Patients with expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score of 0-5.5 Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with other chronic disease of the immune system, malignancies, acute pulmonary disease, cardiac failure, etc. * Pregnant or nursing women For inclusion in the extension phase patients should complete the 24 month core study with or without 24 months on study drug. If a patient discontinued study drug during the core study due to an adverse event, serious adverse event, laboratory abnormality etc. they would be excluded from the Extension Phase. Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
As registered. Criteria can change, so ask the trial team or your neurologist.
About this trial
In the sponsor's words
This study assessed the safety, tolerability and efficacy of two doses of oral fingolimod compared to placebo on efficacy parameters in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).
Papers
Results
Baseline retinal nerve fiber layer thickness as a predictor of multiple sclerosis progression: New insights from the FREEDOMS II study.Eur J Neurol · 2023
Results
Comparing outcomes from clinical studies of oral disease-modifying therapies (dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, and teriflunomide) in relapsing MS: Assessing absolute differences using a number needed to treat analysis.Mult Scler Relat Disord · 2016
Results
Relapse rates in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with fingolimod: Subgroup analyses of pooled data from three phase 3 trials.Mult Scler Relat Disord · 2016
Results
Onset of clinical and MRI efficacy occurs early after fingolimod treatment initiation in relapsing multiple sclerosis.J Neurol · 2016
Results
Efficacy of fingolimod in patients with highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.Curr Med Res Opin · 2015
Results
Correlation between brain volume loss and clinical and MRI outcomes in multiple sclerosis.Neurology · 2015
Results
Safety and efficacy of fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (FREEDOMS II): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.Lancet Neurol · 2014
Mean annualised relapse rate was 0·40 (95% CI 0·34-0·48) in patients given placebo and 0·21 (0·17-0·25) in patients given fingolimod 0·5 mg: rate ratio 0·52 (95% CI 0·40-0·66; p<0·0001), corresponding to a reduction of 48% with fingolimod 0·5 mg versus placebo.
Read by software from the paper's abstract
Results
Baseline retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and macular volume quantified by OCT in the North American phase 3 fingolimod trial for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.J Neuroophthalmol · 2013
Results
Fox RJ, Chan A, Zhang A, Xiao J, Levison D, Lewin JB, Edwards MR, Marantz JL. Comparative effectiveness using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison between delayed-release dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Feb;33(2):175-183. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1248380. Epub 2016 Nov 10.Results
Chinea Martinez AR, Correale J, Coyle PK, Meng X, Tenenbaum N. Efficacy and safety of fingolimod in Hispanic patients with multiple sclerosis: pooled clinical trial analyses. Adv Ther. 2014 Oct;31(10):1072-81. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0154-4. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
Loading reviews and guidelines…
Related trials
- VOYAGE
Phase 3 · Not yet recruiting
Still running
- TG1101-RMS-PED304
Phase 2 / Phase 3 · Recruiting
Still running
- IM047-050
Phase 3 · Recruiting
Still running
- COAST
Phase 4 · Recruiting
Still running
- Assessing the Cognitive Benefits of Ozanimod and Their Br…
Phase 4 · Withdrawn
Stopped early
- A Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of Ozanimo…
Phase 4 · Running, not recruiting
Still running
History
Started
Jun 2006
Main results due
Jun 2011
Finished
Aug 2011
Results posted
Jun 2012
Assembled by software from public sources and not checked by people. Each record links to its source. Report an error