Sativex Versus Placebo When Added to Existing Treatment for Central Neuropathic Pain in MS
What it found
The main measure did not show a significant benefit.
| Measure | Estimate | 95% CI | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Patients With at Least 30% Improvement in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score From Baseline | Odds Ratio (OR) 1.309 | 0.840–2.038 | 0.2338 |
| Change in Mean Pain Due to MS NRS Score | Estimated treatment effect -0.17 | -0.62–0.29 | 0.468 |
Statistical analysis as posted on ClinicalTrials.gov.
What was tested
Treatment tested
- Nabiximols
Placebo or sham
- Placebo
Results by group
Change in Mean Pain Due to MS NRS Score
14 weeks: Baseline - End of Treatment (last 7 days of treatment)
| Group | Value | Interval | Number analysed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sativex | -2.02 units on a scale | 2.15 (Standard Deviation) | 167 |
| Placebo | -1.89 units on a scale | 2.33 (Standard Deviation) | 172 |
Sativex
Placebo
p = 0.468; Estimated treatment effect -0.17 (95% CI -0.62–0.29)
Number of Patients With at Least 30% Improvement in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score From Baseline
14 weeks: Baseline - end of treatment (last 7 days)
| Group | Value | Interval | Number analysed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sativex | 84 participants | 167 | |
| Placebo | 77 participants | 172 |
Sativex
Placebo
p = 0.2338; Odds Ratio (OR) 1.309 (95% CI 0.840–2.038)
Values as posted on ClinicalTrials.gov. Outcomes measured differently across trials are not directly comparable.
Safety
| Group | Participants at risk | Serious adverse events | Deaths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sativex | 167 | 3 (1.8%) | |
| Placebo | 172 | 2 (1.2%) |
As posted on ClinicalTrials.gov. Serious adverse events include any serious health event during the trial, whether or not the treatment caused it.
What it measured
Main measures
Change in Mean Pain Due to MS NRS Score
14 weeks: Baseline - End of Treatment (last 7 days of treatment)
PainNumber of Patients With at Least 30% Improvement in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score From Baseline
14 weeks: Baseline - end of treatment (last 7 days)
PainThe primary endpoint is the mean pain due to MS NRS score taken from the daily IVRS diaries over the last seven days at the end of treatment during the evaluable period (usually week 14).
Pain
Other measures (5)
Change in Pain From Baseline to End of the Treatment Using the NPS (Neuropathic Pain Scale)
14 weeks: Baseline - End of treatment (Week 14)
PainChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Break-through Analgesia Usage
14 weeks: baseline - end of treatment (last 7 days)
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Short Form
14 weeks: Baseline to end of treatment (last 7 days of treatment)
PainChange in Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC)
Week 14
Thinking and memoryPainChange in Sleep Disruption NRS
14 weeks; Baseline to end of treatment (last 7 days)
PainMood and sleep
Who could take part
MS (type not specified) · 18 and over
Inclusion Criteria: * Any disease sub-type of MS of at least two years duration * Central neuropathic pain (CNP) of at least three months and expected to remain stable for the study duration * Moderate CNP defined by NRS pain score at baseline sum to at least 24 * Subject established on or previously tried and failed analgesic therapy for CNP * If receiving disease modifying medications, stable dose for 3 months and maintained for study duration Exclusion Criteria: * Subjects whose identified pain is likely to be nociceptive, musculoskeletal (including spasms) peripheral neuropathic or psychogenic in origin, or due to trigeminal neuralgia. * Other non central neuropathic pain of a severity which is likely to interfere with the patients assessment of CNP * medical history suggests subject is likely to relapse/remit during course of study * history of schizophrenia (including family history), other psychotic illness, severe personality disorder or other significant psychiatric disorder other than depression associated with MS * known or suspected history of alcohol abuse, epilepsy or recurrent seizures or hypersensitivity to cannabinoids * travel outside of the country of residence planned during the study * significant cardiac, renal or hepatic impairment * subjects with current recreational cannabis, medicinal cannabis or synthetic cannabinoid based medications within 3 months prior to study entry and unwilling to abstain for the duration of the study
As registered. Criteria can change, so ask the trial team or your neurologist.
About this trial
In the sponsor's words
The purpose of this study is to find out if cannabis-based medicine compared to a dummy medicine (placebo that contains no active ingredient) can help the central neuropathic pain patients experience as a result of multiple sclerosis. This type of pain "central neuropathic pain" is described as shooting, stabbing, burning or searing like sensation, which is often worse at night.
Papers
Loading reviews and guidelines…
Related trials
- ICE Trial
Phase 4 · Ongoing (inferred)
Still running
- A Study to Investigate Arbaclofen ER Tablets for the Trea…
Phase 3 · Not yet recruiting
Still running
- Cannabis (THC vs. CBD) in Multiple Sclerosis
Phase 2 · Recruiting
Still running
- ICE
Phase 4 · Recruiting
Still running
- Mechanisms of Cannabidiol in Persons With MS: the Role of…
Phase 2 · Recruiting
Still running
- AntibioBoNTA
Phase 3 · Ongoing
Still running
History
Started
Sept 2006
Main results due
Apr 2008
Finished
Sept 2008
Results posted
Jul 2012
Assembled by software from public sources and not checked by people. Each record links to its source. Report an error