PreCISe
What it found
The main measure showed a statistically significant benefit.
| Measure | Estimate | 95% CI | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) Conversion | Cox Proportional Hazard 0.55 | 0.40–0.77 | 0.0005 |
Statistical analysis as posted on ClinicalTrials.gov.
What was tested
Treatment tested
- Glatiramer acetate
Unknown
Placebo or sham
- Placebo
Results by group
Time to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) Conversion
up to 3 years
| Group | Value | Interval | Number analysed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glatiramer Acetate (Double-blind Period) | 657.85 days | 349.3 (Standard Deviation) | 243 |
| Placebo (Double-blind Period) | 590.54 days | 340.2 (Standard Deviation) | 238 |
Glatiramer Acetate (Double-blind Period)
Placebo (Double-blind Period)
p = 0.0005; Cox Proportional Hazard 0.55 (95% CI 0.40–0.77)
Twenty-fifth Percentile (25%) Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time From Randomization to Conversion to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) During the Double-blind Period
up to 3 years
| Group | Value | Interval | Number analysed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glatiramer Acetate (Double-blind Period) | 722 days | 243 | |
| Placebo (Double-blind Period) | 336 days | 260–456 | 238 |
Glatiramer Acetate (Double-blind Period)
Placebo (Double-blind Period)
Values as posted on ClinicalTrials.gov. Outcomes measured differently across trials are not directly comparable.
Safety
| Group | Participants at risk | Serious adverse events | Deaths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo (Double-blind Period) | 238 | 19 (8.0%) | |
| Glatiramer Acetate (Double-blind Period) | 243 | 11 (4.5%) | |
| Glatiramer Acetate (Entire Study) | 454 | 44 (9.7%) |
As posted on ClinicalTrials.gov. Serious adverse events include any serious health event during the trial, whether or not the treatment caused it.
What it measured
Main measures
Time to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) Conversion
up to 3 years
RelapsesMRI lesionsTwenty-fifth Percentile (25%) Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time From Randomization to Conversion to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) During the Double-blind Period
up to 3 years
Relapses
Other measures (4)
Number of New T2 Brain Lesions Observed at the Last Observed Value (LOV) in the Double-blind Period
up to 3 years
MRI lesionsChange From Baseline to Last Observed Value (LOV) in T2 Brain Lesion Volume in the Double-blind Period
Day 0 (baseline), up to 3 years
MRI lesionsPercentage Change in Brain Volume From Baseline to the Last Observed Value (LOV) During the Double-blind Period Using the Structural Image Evaluation of Normalized Atrophy (SIENA) Technique
Day 0 (baseline), up to 3 years
MRI lesionsBrain volume lossPercentage of Participants Who Converted to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) During the Double-blind Period
up to 3 years
RelapsesMRI lesions
Who could take part
Early (CIS/RIS) · 18 to 45
Inclusion Criteria: 1. The subject must have undergone a single clinical attack. 2. The subject must have a unifocal clinical presentation. 3. The subject should be enrolled within the period of 90 days after onset of a single unifocal clinical attack (index attack). 4. There must be 2 or more cerebral lesions highly suspicious of multiple sclerosis (MS) on the screening Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), measuring 6mm or more in diameter. 5. Subjects must be between the ages of 18 and 45 years inclusive. 6. Subjects must not have taken corticosteroids within the 30 days prior to the MRI at the baseline visit. 7. Subjects may be male or female. Women of child-bearing potential must practice a medically acceptable method of birth control. Acceptable methods include oral contraceptive, contraceptive patch, long-acting injectable contraceptive, or double-barrier method (condom or intrauterine device with spermicide). 8. The subjects must be willing and able to give written informed consent, prior to entering the study. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Multifocal clinical presentation. 2. Diseases other than MS responsible for the clinical/MRI presentation. The following laboratory tests must be part of the subject's medical history for differential diagnosis of clinically isolated syndrome (CIS): erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), antinuclear antibody (ANA), complement (C3, C4) and anticardiolipin IgG - IgM. In the event that the results of these tests are inconclusive, the following additional tests may be requested by the Eligibility Evaluation Committee: syphilis screening, vitamin B12 and folic acid. In the case of spinal cord CIS presentation, a spinal cord MRI is required for confirmation of diagnosis in the medical history of the subject. 3. Use of experimental or investigational drugs, including IV immunoglobulin, and/or participation in an investigational drug study within 6 months prior to study entry. 4. Use of interferon agents within 6 months prior to the screening visit. 5. Chronic corticosteroid treatment (more than 30 consecutive days) in the 6 months prior to study entry. 6. Pregnancy or breast feeding. 7. Subjects who experience a relapse between the screening (month -1) and baseline (month 0) visits. 8. Life-threatening or other clinically significant disease. 9. A medical or psychiatric condition that affects the subject's ability to give informed consent, or to complete the study, or if the subject is considered by the treating neurologist/physician to be, for any other reason, an unsuitable candidate for this study. 10. A known history of sensitivity to mannitol. 11. A known history of sensitivity to gadolinium. 12. Inability to successfully undergo MRI scanning.
As registered. Criteria can change, so ask the trial team or your neurologist.
About this trial
In the sponsor's words
The primary objective is to assess the effect of treatment with glatiramer acetate (GA) compared to placebo on the time to conversion to CDMS, as determined by Poser criteria (the occurrence of the second clinical attack) during the double-blind period. The secondary objective is to assess, within the time frame of the up to 3-year double-blind, placebo-controlled study period, the effect of GA on clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) parameters. The long-term objectives of the study (exploratory in nature) are to assess, within the time frame of 5 years, the neuroprotective effect of early versus delayed treatment with GA as reflected by clinical and MRI parameters measuring the accumulated irreversible brain tissue damage. A pre-planned interim analysis was performed on all efficacy and safety data accumulated in the database up to October 14, 2007, i.e. when 81% of exposure to treatment in the double-blind, placebo-controlled period had been collected. Upon review of the interim analysis results, the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) recommended that the double-blind portion of the study be stopped and that subjects be switched to the 2-year Open-label period, during which time they would have the option of receiving GA therapy. The sponsor (Teva) adopted the DMC recommendations and took the necessary action towards its implementation.
Papers
Results
Neuroprotection with glatiramer acetate: evidence from the PreCISe trial.J Neurol · 2013
Results
Effect of glatiramer acetate on conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (PreCISe study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Lancet · 2009
Loading reviews and guidelines…
Related trials
- PACAMUS
Phase 4 · Completed
No result found
History
Started
Jan 2004
Main results due
Oct 2007
Finished
Jun 2010
Results posted
Jun 2012
Assembled by software from public sources and not checked by people. Each record links to its source. Report an error