Stopped earlyPhase 2Relapsing MSNCT049710052016-001166-29

What it found

Stopped early

The trial ended early for another reason (see below).

Reason given: Lack of recruitment due to low acceptance of the control arm.

This trial finished 4 years ago. We found no results in the registry or in any paper that cites it.

What was tested

Treatment tested

  • Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • autologous hematopoietic stem cells

Compared with

What it measured

Main measures

  • Time to treatment failure as assessed by failure of NEDA (no evidence of disease activity)

    through study completion, on average at least 2 years

    Disability progressionRelapsesMRI lesions

Other measures (10)

  • Efficacy of treatment defined by EDSS

    through study completion, on average at least 2 years

    Disability progression
  • Efficacy of treatment defined by the annualized relapse rate

    through study completion, on average at least 2 years

    Relapses
  • Efficacy of treatment defined by the number of new T2 lesions

    through study completion, on average at least 2 years

    MRI lesions
  • Efficacy of treatment defined by the number of Gd-enhancing lesions

    through study completion, on average at least 2 years

    MRI lesions
  • Efficacy of treatment defined by multiple sclerosis functional composite (MSFC) change

    through study completion, on average at least 2 years

    Disability progressionThinking and memory
  • Efficacy of treatment defined by Hamburg quality of life scale in MS (HAQUAMS)

    through study completion, on average at least 2 years

    Quality of life (reported by participants)
  • Efficacy of treatment defined by the Percentage Brain Volume Change (PBVC)

    through study completion, on average at least 2 years

    MRI lesionsBrain volume loss
  • Efficacy of treatment defined by grey and white matter atrophy

    through study completion, on average at least 2 years

    MRI lesionsBrain volume loss
  • Rate of AE / SAE including NCI grade 3 and 4 non-haematological toxicities

    through study completion, on average at least 2 years

    Safety
  • Efficacy:

Who could take part

Relapsing MS · 18 to 55

Inclusion Criteria (Based on CARE-MS-II3, guidelines and Rio-criteria for treatment failure): * Written informed consent and agreement to comply to study protocol * Age: 18-55 years * EDSS: 0.0 - 6.0 * RRMS according to McDonald 2010 * \< 10 years of disease course after symptom onset * Active disease with one of the following treatment failures occur-ring not earlier than 6 months after initiation of an approved DMT * 2 or more relapses within the last 12 months or * 1 relapse within the last 12 months and a Gd-enhancing lesion on MRI > 3 mm > 3 months before or after relapse onset or 2 new T2-lesions or * On-going signs of MRI activity in the last 6 months (either Gd-en-hancing of ≥ 3 mm lesion at any exam in the last year; or more than 5 new T2 lesions (≥ 3 mm) or * Patients stable under natalizumab but who have to stop treatment due to an increasing PML risk are defined as active, if a MRI within 6 months after termination of natalizumab shows new T2 or Gd-enhancing lesions and at least one other treatment fail-ure prior to natalizumab is documented. Exclusion Criteria: * Secondary or primary progressive MS * Pregnancy, or other medical condition incompatible with aHSCT * Any treatment or medical condition that, according to the haematologist / transplant specialist precludes the use of aHSCT * John Cunningham virus (JCV) antibody index of > 1.5 in previ-ously natalizumab-treated patients, if a negative CSF JCV-PCR prior to screening is not available * Relapse during 30 days before initiation of treatment. If a relapse occurs during this period and eligibility criteria are otherwise ful-filled, start of treatment will be delayed until at least 30 days after receiving steroids. * Concurrent clinically significant (as determined by the investiga-tors and haematologist / transplant specialist) cardiac, immuno-logical, pulmonary, neurological, renal or other major disease such as: * Prominent cardial disease (Left ventricular ejection frac-tion (LVEF) \< 40%, myocardial infarction or ischemia, un-controlled arrhythmias, pericardial effusion > 1 cm) * Cerebrovascular disease * Renal disease (creatinine clearance \< 30 ml/min/m2) * Respiratory disease (DLCO \< 40% predicted) * Active bleeding or clotting disease * History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or posi-tive HIV antibody testing * Any uncontrolled acute or chronic infection, including HIV, hepatitis B surface antigen positivity and hepatitis C PCR positivity * Cancer except in situ cervix or cutaneous * Unwillingness or inability to comply with the requirements of this protocol including the presence of any condition (physical, men-tal, or social) that is likely to affect the patient returning for follow-up visits on schedule. Unwillingness to use contraception. * Previous participation in this study, previous treatment with aHSCT or already both comparators * Ongoing immunotherapy. Treatment with interferon or glati-rameracetate will need no wash-out. Treatment pause before oc-relizumab/alemtuzumab or aHSCT will be: * for dimethylfumarate and fingolimod: 8 weeks * for natalizumab: 8 weeks * for ocrelizumab: 12 weeks * for alemtuzumab: 12 months * for teriflunomide: 4 weeks after elimination with cholesty-ramine * for cladribine: 24 weeks * Patients with cognitive impairments who are unable to provide written, informed consent prior to any testing under this protocol, including screening and baseline investigations that are not con-sidered part of routine patient care.

As registered. Criteria can change, so ask the trial team or your neurologist.

About this trial

In the sponsor's words

A multicentre controlled phase II trial to compare the efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab or alemtuzumab and autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (aHSCT). Active relapsing-remitting MS-Patients will be included and randomised to ocrelizumab or alemtuzumab versus aHSCT. Primary endpoint will be the time to treatment failure as assessed by failure of NEDA (no evidence of disease activity) as represented by: no expanded disability status scale (EDSS) progression, no relapse, no new T2 lesion and no Gd-enhancing lesion. This trial offers the opportunity to gain further information about efficacy and safety of all treatments and will give new insights into the immunology of highly active RRMS.

Loading reviews and guidelines…

Related trials

History

    1. Started

      Aug 2021

    2. Main results due

      Feb 2022

    3. Finished

      Feb 2022

    Assembled by software from public sources and not checked by people. Each record links to its source. Report an error