A single site feasibility two arm randomised controlled trial of peer coaching for adults with long term conditions: the PEER CONNECT study

Completed (inferred)MS (type not specified)ISRCTN12623577

What it found

Paper found, not read

A paper reports the results; we have not read it yet. See Papers below.

What it measured

Main measures

  • 1. Feasibility outcomes: 1.1. Peer recruitment rate (%) = number of peers recruited/ potentially eligible cohort (indicated by the number of information packs sent or handed out) x100 1.2. Coach recruitment rate (%) = number of volunteer coaches recruited/ potentially eligible cohort (indicated by the number of information packs sent or handed out) x100 1.3. Retention rates will be calculated as t

    Feasibility

Other measures (1)

  • 1. Patient Activation is measured using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM®) at baseline, six and nine months. 2. Mental wellbeing is measured using the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale at baseline, six and nine months. 3. General health status and quality of life is measured using the SF-36 at baseline, six and nine months. 4. Health confidence is measured using the Health Confidence Sco

    PainQuality of life (reported by participants)

Who could take part

MS (type not specified) · 18 to 110

Show the full criteria

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion: 1. Aged 18 years or older (peers and volunteer coaches) 2. Attendance at one of three outpatient clinics (rheumatology, pain and multiple sclerosis) in TSDFT (peers and volunteer coaches) 3. PAM Level 1 or 2 (peers), PAM 3 or 4 (volunteer coaches) 4. Willing and able to engage in the six-month intervention (peers and volunteer coaches) 5. Willing and able to commit to undertaking assessments at baseline, six and nine months (peers). 6. Capacity to provide informed consent (peers and volunteer coaches) 7. Sufficient fluency in English to be able to engage with the intervention and study material (peers and volunteer coaches) Exclusion: 1. Aged under 18 years 2. Potential peers scoring PAM 3 or 4 3. Potential volunteer coaches scoring PAM 1 or 2 4. Participation in another observational/ interventional research trial 5. Not able to commit to six-month intervention period 6. Not able to provide informed consent 7. Insufficient fluency in English to engage with intervention/ study material

Exclusion criteria

Not separately supplied in the registry.

As registered. Criteria can change, so ask the trial team or your neurologist.

About this trial

In the sponsor's words

Background and study aims NHS England estimates that 25-40% of patients have poor knowledge of their health condition(s) and poor skills and confidence to manage their health and well-being. People with less confidence and skills to manage their health condition (termed here low activation) are more likely to have unmet health needs and require emergency care. Receiving focused support from someone managing their health and well-being well (peer coaching) may help. Torbay Medical Research Fund is funding a study to see how easy it is to set up and evaluate a volunteer peer coaching service for people from rheumatology, chronic pain, and multiple sclerosis clinics at Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust. People reporting high levels of knowledge, skills, and confidence (high activation) are providing the coaching. These volunteers will take part in a coaching training programme and be supervised through monthly group and individual sessions with coach coordinators. Volunteers will coach interested people over six months in the form of short conversations lasting 15 minutes to an hour. Coaching will be provided in a Covid-19 secure environment either online via MS teams, by telephone, or face-to-face. Who can participate? People attending pain, rheumatology, or multiple sclerosis clinics at Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust who meet the above inclusion criteria to either be a coach or receive coaching. What does the study involve? People eligible and wanting to be coached (referred to as peers) will be allocated (using a process similar to tossing a coin) to receive either peer coaching and usual care, or usual care only. At the beginning of the study, after six months and again three months later peers will be asked to complete a range of health and well-being questionnaires. Peers, coaches, staff, and study decliners will be interviewed about their experiences. After the nine months, people receiving only usual care will be offered coaching. Findings from the study will enable the researchers to decide whether or not a larger trial of a volunteer peer coaching service is possible and how best to do it. What are the possible benefits and risks of participating? Coaches Benefits- It is possible that training to be a coach and talking about experiences of coaching will enhance a coach's own knowledge, skills or confidence for managing their health and they may experience other positive benefits from contributing to research and service development processes. Risks- it is possible that discussing experiences of coaching may cause emotional distress. If this does occur we will ensure the coach has the opportunity to discuss their experiences further with someone from the peer coaching service. Peers Benefits- it is hoped that taking part in the coaching will enhance knowledge, skills, and confidence to manage their health more effectively. Risks-it is possible that interpersonal issues may arise between peers and their coaches. Should this occur both parties will be encouraged to report such issues to the coaching coordinator and alternative coaching arrangements will be made. It is possible that coaches may offer inaccurate advice which could be detrimental to how someone manages their condition. To try and ensure this does not happen, coaches will be trained to recognise boundaries to their role and limitations of their own knowledge. Any uncertainties will be addressed through regular supervisory meetings with the coordinator. To ensure the safety of peers and coaches, the coach training will include elements of safeguarding, data protection, and study reporting procedures. In addition, all coaches will have completed a DBS (Disclosure and Barring Service) check prior to working with peers. Where is the study run from? University of Plymouth and Torbay and South Devon NHS Trust (UK) When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for? April 2021 to August 2023 Who is funding the study? Torbay Medical Research Fund (UK) Who is the main contact? Dr Agne Straukiene, agne.straukiene@nhs.net Rachel Dennett, rachel.dennett@plymouth.ac.uk

Papers

Loading reviews and guidelines…

History

    1. Started

      Nov 2021

    2. Finished

      Aug 2023

    Assembled by software from public sources.