A multi-centre randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a home-based self-management standing frame programme plus usual care versus usual care in people with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) who have severely impaired balance and mobility

Completed (inferred)Progressive MSISRCTN69614598

What it found

Paper found, not read

A paper reports the results; we have not read it yet. See Papers below.

What it measured

Main measures

  • Motor function is measured using the Amended Motor Club Assessment at baseline, 20 and 36 weeks.

Other measures (1)

  • 1. Bowel and Bladder Control is measured using the self report Bladder and Bowel Control Scales at baseline, 20 and 36 weeks 2. Falls frequency is determined at baseline, 20 and 36 weeks 3. Knee extensor strength is measured using dynanometry at baseline, 20 and 36 weeks 4. Length of hip flexors are measured using goniometry at baseline, 20 and 36 weeks 5. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) are me

    Walking and mobilityPhysical functionSpasticityBladder, bowel and sexual functionQuality of life (reported by participants)

Who could take part

Progressive MS · 18 and over

Show the full criteria

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion: 1. Individuals diagnosed with primary or secondary progressive MS according to McDonald’s criteria 2. Aged 18 years or over 3.Willing and able to consent to participate 4. Scoring 6.5-8.0 on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), i.e. people who “require bilateral assistance to walk 20 metres or less” to those “restricted to bed or wheelchair” 5. Ability of the home / family to accommodate the standing frame 6. Able to get into a standing frame independently or with assistance from a carer 7. Agreement of another person (e.g. carer) should assistance be necessary for the standing programme 8. Willing and able to travel to local assessment centres for blinded outcomes assessment Exclusion: 1. Any recent changes in disease modifying therapies (more specifically if they have ever had Campath, are within past 6 months of ceasing Nataluzimab, or are within 3 months of ceasing any other MS disease modifying drug) 2. Have relapsed/received steroid treatment within the last month 3. Are currently, or during the past 6 months have undertaken a regular standing frame programme(more than once a week) 4. Have a history of osteoporotic-related fractures 5. Have comorbidities which contraindicate standing in the frame (e.g. foot ulceration, uncontrolled epilepsy) or likely to impact on the trial (e.g. chronic jaundice, heart disease, age related multiple co-morbidities) 6. Currently participating in another clinical trial (rehabilitation or pharmacological)

Exclusion criteria

Not separately supplied in the registry.

As registered. Criteria can change, so ask the trial team or your neurologist.

About this trial

In the sponsor's words

Background and study aims Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common diseases of the central nervous system (brain and spinal cord). Healthy nerves are coated in a fatty casing (myelin sheath) which helps messages to travel quickly and smoothly along nerves. When a person is suffering from MS, the immune system, which normally helps to protect against infection, attacks the myelin sheath, stripping it from the nerves (demyelination). This demyelination means that messages cannot travel along the nerves effectively causing a range of disabilities, such as walking problems and immobility. Being able to stand upright is highly valued by most people, both mentally and physically. Standing frames are commonly used by people with spinal cord injury (SCI) who are unable to stand unaided. These frames provide support to enable even severely disabled patients to stand safely. Regular use has been shown to reduce complications of immobility (such as pressure sores and muscle wasting) and boost feelings of wellbeing. Many people with MS develop severe walking problems and so spend much of their day sitting down. The associated complications impact on quality of life and result in increased healthcare needs. These problems can be minimised if physical activity is increased, however without easy access to a frame, people must travel to a rehabilitation/MS centre to stand which can be both expensive and time consuming. Using a standing frame at home may offer a solution which reduces the economic and social costs for the patient and NHS. The aim of this study is to test the effectiveness of a home-based standing programme with a frame in people who are severely disabled by their MS. Who can participate? Adults with MS who require assistance to walk more than 20 metres or who are restricted to a bed or wheelchair. What does the study involve? Participants are randomly allocated to one of two groups. Participants in the first group receive two, home-based, hour-long therapy sessions, during which time they are taught how to use the standing frame, followed by six 15-minute telephone consultations. The participants are encouraged to stand in the frame for 30 minutes, three times a week. In order to offer further support, participants are given user-friendly information leaflets and DVDs. Participants in the second group continue to receive usual care. At the start of the study and then again after 20 and 36 weeks, participants in both groups complete a number of questionnaires and assessments in order to test if their motor (movement) abilities and quality of life have improved. What are the possible benefits and risks of participating? Participants may benefit from an increased level of physical activity and improvements to movement and mood as a result of regularly standing in the frame. Risks of taking part are small but some participants may experience some increased fatigue, muscle stiffness or soreness because muscles that may not have been moved in a long time are being used. Where is the study run from? Peninsula Allied Health Centre (Plymouth University) and at least 30 other health centres catering for people with MS across Devon, Cornwall and East Anglia (UK) When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for? September 2015 to March 2017 Who is funding the study? National Institute for Health Research (UK) Who is the main contact? Dr Jennifer Freeman jenny.freeman@plymouth.ac.uk

Papers

Loading reviews and guidelines…

History

    1. Started

      Sept 2015

    2. Finished

      Mar 2018

    Assembled by software from public sources.