CompletedPhase 3Relapsing and progressiveNCT001345632004-000555-42

What it found

Met its main goal

The main measure showed a statistically significant benefit.

MeasureEstimate95% CIp
Annualized Relapse Rate [ARR]: Poisson Regression EstimatesRelative Risk Reduction (%) 31.20.0002
Annualized Relapse Rate [ARR]: Poisson Regression EstimatesRelative risk reduction (%) 31.50.0005

Statistical analysis as posted on ClinicalTrials.gov.

What was tested

Treatment tested

Placebo or sham

  • Placebo (for teriflunomide)

Results by group

Annualized Relapse Rate [ARR]: Poisson Regression Estimates

108 weeks

GroupValueIntervalNumber analysed
Placebo0.539 relapses per year0.466–0.623363
Teriflunomide 7 mg0.370 relapses per year0.318–0.432365
Teriflunomide 14 mg0.369 relapses per year0.308–0.441358

Placebo

0.539

Teriflunomide 7 mg

0.37

Teriflunomide 14 mg

0.369

p = 0.0005; Relative risk reduction (%) 31.5

Values as posted on ClinicalTrials.gov. Outcomes measured differently across trials are not directly comparable.

Safety

GroupParticipants at riskSerious adverse eventsDeaths
Placebo36046 (12.8%)
Teriflunomide 7 mg36852 (14.1%)
Teriflunomide 14 mg35857 (15.9%)

As posted on ClinicalTrials.gov. Serious adverse events include any serious health event during the trial, whether or not the treatment caused it.

What it measured

Main measures

  • Annualized Relapse Rate [ARR]: Poisson Regression Estimates

    108 weeks

    Disability progressionRelapses
  • The primary efficacy variable will be the annual relapse rate, defined as the number of relapses per subject-year. A gross estimate of annual relapse rate for a treatment group would be the total number of relapses incurred by the subjects in that group divided by the sum of study durations (in year) of all subjects in the group.

    Relapses

Other measures (3)

  • Time to 12-week Sustained Disability Progression: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of Disability Progression at Timepoints

    108 weeks

    Disability progression
  • Cerebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging [MRI] Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Volume (Burden of Disease)

    baseline (before randomization) and 108 weeks

    MRI lesions
  • Changes From Baseline in Fatigue Impact Scale [FIS] Total Score

    baseline (before randomization) and 108 weeks

    Disability progressionThinking and memoryFatigue

Who could take part

Relapsing and progressive · 18 to 55

Inclusion Criteria: * Multiple sclerosis [MS] subject who was ambulatory (EDSS of ≤ 5.5) * Exhibiting a relapsing clinical course, with or without progression (relapsing remitting, secondary progressive or progressive relapsing); * Meeting McDonald's criteria for MS diagnosis; * Experienced at least 1 relapse over the 1 year preceding the trial or at least 2 relapses over the 2 years preceding the trial; * No relapse onset in the preceding 60 days prior to randomization; * Clinically stable during the 30 days prior to randomization, without adrenocorticotrophic hormone [ACTH] or systemic steroid treatment. Exclusion Criteria: * Clinically relevant cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological, endocrine or other major systemic disease; * Significantly impaired bone marrow function; * Pregnant or nursing woman; * Alcohol or drug abuse; * Use of cladribine, mitoxantrone, or other immunosuppressant agents such as azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporin, methotrexate or mycophenolate before enrollment; * Any known condition or circumstance that would prevent in the investigator's opinion compliance or completion of the study;

As registered. Criteria can change, so ask the trial team or your neurologist.

About this trial

In the sponsor's words

The primary objective was to determine the effect of teriflunomide on the frequency of relapses in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Secondary objectives were: * to evaluate the effect of teriflunomide on the accumulation of disability as measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS], the burden of disease as measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging [MRI] and patient-reported fatigue; * to evaluate the safety and tolerability of teriflunomide.

Papers

Loading reviews and guidelines…

Related trials

History

    1. Started

      Sept 2004

    2. Main results due

      Jul 2010

    3. Finished

      Jul 2010

    4. Results posted

      Nov 2012

    Assembled by software from public sources and not checked by people. Each record links to its source. Report an error