Proposal to Create a Flagship Neurology and Palliative Care Service for South London

CompletedPhase 1Phase 2MS (type not specified)NCT00364936

What it found

Paper found, not read

A paper reports the results; we have not read it yet. See Papers below.

What was tested

Treatment tested

  • Palliative care service

What it measured

Main measures

  • Palliative Care Outcome Scale - Symptoms

    12 weeks

Other measures (7)

  • Self-reported quality of life

    12 weeks

    Quality of life (reported by participants)
  • Impact of MS

    12 weeks

  • Psychosocial palliative care outcomes

    12 weeks

  • use of health and social services

    12 weeks

  • Experience of hospital services

    12 weeks

  • Carer burden and satisfaction

    12 weeks

    Quality of life (reported by participants)
  • Costs (formal and informal)

    12 weeks

Who could take part

MS (type not specified)

Show the full criteria

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of MS * Living in South East London * Having possible palliative care needs. Referrers were encouraged to identify people as severely affected with MS based on their clinical need, rather than relying on any standardised measures of disability. However, since a large Canadian population study identified that approximately 15% of people with MS have an Expanded Disability Scale Score of 8 or more (out of a possible 10)23, this was also suggested to referrers as a benchmark for disability that would prompt consideration of referral. Examples of palliative care needs were given as unresolved symptoms, psychosocial concerns, and end of life issues, progressive illness or complex needs.

Exclusion criteria

* patients deemed as having urgent needs (following independent review by a consultant in palliative medicine) because of rapid deterioration or severe symptoms - these were seen immediately by the service.

As registered. Criteria can change, so ask the trial team or your neurologist.

About this trial

In the sponsor's words

The primary purpose of this study is to develop, implement and conduct a preliminary evaluation of a new service for people who are severely affected by multiple sclerosis. The investigators conducted open interviews with patients, families and staff, plus a literature review to model and pilot this new service. Then the investigators developed, tested and ran the service and will evaluate it using a randomised controlled trial, where people affected by MS are randomised to either receive the service immediately (fast track group) or after a three month wait (standard best practice). This methodology follows that of the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for the development and evaluation of complex services and treatments. The investigators interview people and their carers in the fast track and standard practice groups, and followed them over time. This phase of trial enables us to calculate sample size and test proof of concept for a full randomised trial. However, our working hypothesis was that there would be no difference between those people who received the fast track service or the standard best practice in terms of symptom controlled, and carer needs.

Papers

Loading reviews and guidelines…

History

    1. Started

      Mar 2004

    2. Finished

      Dec 2006

    Assembled by software from public sources.