A Randomized Trial of a Formal Group Program for Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis

CompletedNot a drug-phase studyMS (type not specified)NCT01918800

What it found

Missed its main goal

The main measure did not show a significant benefit.

MeasureEstimate95% CIp
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale .64

Statistical analysis as posted on ClinicalTrials.gov.

What was tested

Treatment tested

  • Fatigue: Take control

Compared with

  • MS: Take Control

Results by group

Modified Fatigue Impact Scale

4 months

GroupValueIntervalNumber analysed
Fatigue: Take Control46.1 units on a scale12.2 (Standard Deviation)109
MS: Take Control46.7 units on a scale11.9 (Standard Deviation)109

Fatigue: Take Control

46.1

MS: Take Control

46.7

p = .64

Values as posted on ClinicalTrials.gov. Outcomes measured differently across trials are not directly comparable.

Safety

GroupParticipants at riskSerious adverse eventsDeaths
Fatigue: Take Control10912 (11.0%)
MS: Take Control10910 (9.2%)

As posted on ClinicalTrials.gov. Serious adverse events include any serious health event during the trial, whether or not the treatment caused it.

What it measured

Main measures

  • Modified Fatigue Impact Scale

    4 months

    Thinking and memoryFatigue

Other measures (6)

  • Multiple Sclerosis Self Efficacy Scale

    4 months

  • Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)

    4 months

    FatigueBladder, bowel and sexual functionMood and sleep
  • SF-36

    4 months

    Quality of life (reported by participants)
  • Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA)

    4 months

    Physical function
  • Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    4 months

    Myelin repairMood and sleep
  • Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25-FW)

    4 months

    Disability progressionWalking and mobility

Who could take part

MS (type not specified) · 18 and over

Show the full criteria

Inclusion criteria

* A diagnosis of MS by 2010 updated McDonald Criteria * At least 18 years of age * Able to walk 60 feet without human assistance or architectural support (walls) but with any personal assistive device (cane, crutches, walker) (EDSS-S of 6.5 or less at Visit 1) * Fluent in written and spoken English, as educational intervention and questionnaires have not been validated in languages other than English. * Score of greater than 25 on MFIS indicating MS-related fatigue

Exclusion criteria

* Severe depression (score on the Beck Depression Inventory II greater than 28) * Current substance abuse disorder or psychosis * Any significant uncontrolled medical problem that would limit participation or completion of the study * MS relapse within the 30 days before screening * Initiation of new disease modifying treatment within 3 months prior to start of study or participating in an interventional research study * Current or prior participation in a fatigue management program * Pregnant women

As registered. Criteria can change, so ask the trial team or your neurologist.

About this trial

In the sponsor's words

The purpose of this study is to compare two different educational programs for people with multiple sclerosis (MS), which is a common and often disabling disease of the central nervous system. MS causes many symptoms including difficulty walking, loss of balance or muscle coordination, fatigue, numbness and tingling and stiffness. The investigators want to determine which program is better at helping improve quality of life and MS symptoms. Both programs use material from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (NMSS). Both programs include 6 weekly 2-hour class sessions. Up to 600 participants will be enrolled total in 4 VA sites, with about 150 at each site. There will be 10 study visits, all to occur within 11 months. These include 1 baseline visit, 6 two-hour class visits, and 3 follow-up data collection visits. The participants in Portland will also participate in a final 12 month followup visit. Participants will be randomly (by chance) assigned to be part of either group education program. They will have a 1:1 or 50% chance of being in either program.

Papers

Loading reviews and guidelines…

History

    1. Started

      Mar 2013

    2. Main results due

      Dec 2015

    3. Finished

      Dec 2015

    4. Results posted

      Mar 2017

    Assembled by software from public sources.