Efficacy Study of "Imaginative Distention", a Self Managed Tool to Cop

Treatment tested

• "Imaginative Distention" technique

Other measures (5)

Imaginative Distention (ID) is proposed as supportive and integrative intervention to cope with fatigue, (principal end point), to cope with insomnia, stress perception and to improve QoL of pw MS, insomnia pw and health care personnel. ID is safe and it can be easily learned and practised without of any particular instrument and also feasible in disabled pw. This technique allows persons to experience the body as a source of well-being and not just fatigue, pain and disease. ID can become a self managed tool of empowerment to cope with MS, to reduce its negative impact on daily life and job performances. Adherence to pharmacological therapies could be improved using ID. For pw MS ID could have specific and customizable rehabilitation implications to improve motor disability, as already seen in stroke patients. The principal end point of the trial is verify ID efficacy on fatigue and its specificity on pw MS at the end of the training. For this reason, ID efficacy will be tested in comparative terms too. Among all possible comparison populations, we selected: pw insomnia, which is stress related disease and health personnel, because at risk of stress. The control groups comparison permits to evaluate the specificity of ID on pw MS. The three groups are randomised to intervention or waiting list. The training is 8 weekly session long. Self administered questionnaire are filled by participants before and after the training, and 3-6 months later. The extent of change in outcome measure monitored in each exposed group vs. unexposed will allow to separate the non-disease specific effect of ID from the MS-specific effect. The difference in estimates will allow to determine the extent of the true effect of ID in pw MS. All outcome measure will be compared among all groups mentioned and over time. The study would identify also the most important outcome measures for MS patients questioning them in a focus group. This aspect is very important because could differs from which clinicians and researchers think about.