Spinal Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Pain in Multiple Sclerosi
Spinal Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Pain in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical and Neurophysiological Assessment and Evaluation of Endocannabinoid System Activity
What it found
A paper reports the results; we have not read it yet. See Papers below.
What was tested
Treatment tested
- Experimental treatment
Placebo
- Placebo treatment
What it measured
Main measures
sDCS efficacy in pain as determined by NPSI and NRS scale
30 days
Pain
Other measures (2)
Central endocannabinoid level as determined by Activity of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase (FAAH) in platelets
30 days
SpasticityBladder, bowel and sexual functionPainSpasticity as determined by Ashworth Scale
30 days
Nerve conduction testsSpasticity
Who could take part
Relapsing and progressive · 18 and over
Show the full criteria
Inclusion criteria
* Relapsing-remitting (RR), secondary-progressive (SP) and primary-progressive (PP) MS patients, affected by neuropathic or nociceptive chronic pain conditions in accordance to 1994 IASP (International Association for the Study of Pain) classification
Exclusion criteria
* Any form of headache * Cognitive impairment (Minimental State Examination \<= 21) * Psychiatry diseases, in particular depression (Back Depression Inventory Scale >15)
As registered. Criteria can change, so ask the trial team or your neurologist.
About this trial
In the sponsor's words
Pain represents one of the most common symptoms of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) that can seriously affect patient health-related quality of life. Central neuropathic pain, the main form of pain in MS patients, represents a significant clinical problem, in consideration of its poorly responsiveness to available therapies. Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive, well-tolerated procedure with an high and well documented neuromodulation activity at Central Nervous System (CNS) level. First evidences obtained by animal, neurophysiological and clinical studies suggested its potential efficacy in neuropathic pain treatment. In particular spinal DCS (sDCS) has been proven to modulate Nociceptive Withdrawal Reflex (NWR), an objective and sensitive tool to explore pain processing at the Spinal Level and recommended by European Federation of Neurological Society (EFNS) to evaluate the analgesic effect of treatments. In this order of view the investigators' objective is to investigate sDCS efficacy in MS neurophatic pain treatment applying validated clinical scales, neurophysiological acquisitions and specific biological marker dosages.
Papers
Results
Berra E, Bergamaschi R, De Icco R, Dagna C, Perrotta A, Rovaris M, Grasso MG, Anastasio MG, Pinardi G, Martello F, Tamburin S, Sandrini G, Tassorelli C. The Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation on Neuropathic Pain in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical and Neurophysiological Assessment. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Feb 12;13:31. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00031. eCollection 2019.Background
Solaro C, Brichetto G, Amato MP, Cocco E, Colombo B, D'Aleo G, Gasperini C, Ghezzi A, Martinelli V, Milanese C, Patti F, Trojano M, Verdun E, Mancardi GL; PaIMS Study Group. The prevalence of pain in multiple sclerosis: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Neurology. 2004 Sep 14;63(5):919-21. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000137047.85868.d6.Background
O'Connor AB, Schwid SR, Herrmann DN, Markman JD, Dworkin RH. Pain associated with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and proposed classification. Pain. 2008 Jul;137(1):96-111. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.024. Epub 2007 Oct 24.Background
Nitsche MA, Seeber A, Frommann K, Klein CC, Rochford C, Nitsche MS, Fricke K, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Tergau F. Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol. 2005 Oct 1;568(Pt 1):291-303. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.092429. Epub 2005 Jul 7.Background
Ferrucci R, Mameli F, Guidi I, Mrakic-Sposta S, Vergari M, Marceglia S, Cogiamanian F, Barbieri S, Scarpini E, Priori A. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves recognition memory in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2008 Aug 12;71(7):493-8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000317060.43722.a3. Epub 2008 Jun 4.Background
Fregni F, Thome-Souza S, Nitsche MA, Freedman SD, Valente KD, Pascual-Leone A. A controlled clinical trial of cathodal DC polarization in patients with refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2006 Feb;47(2):335-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00426.x.Background
O'Connell NE, Wand BM, Marston L, Spencer S, Desouza LH. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain. A report of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;47(2):309-26. Epub 2011 Apr 14.Background
Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, Filippi M, Hartung HP, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Metz LM, McFarland HF, O'Connor PW, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Thompson AJ, Weinshenker BG, Wolinsky JS. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the "McDonald Criteria". Ann Neurol. 2005 Dec;58(6):840-6. doi: 10.1002/ana.20703.Background
Cruccu G, Anand P, Attal N, Garcia-Larrea L, Haanpaa M, Jorum E, Serra J, Jensen TS. EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment. Eur J Neurol. 2004 Mar;11(3):153-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.00791.x.Background
Sandrini G, Serrao M, Rossi P, Romaniello A, Cruccu G, Willer JC. The lower limb flexion reflex in humans. Prog Neurobiol. 2005 Dec;77(6):353-95. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.11.003. Epub 2005 Dec 28.
Loading reviews and guidelines…
History
Started
Nov 2013
Main results due
Jun 2015
Finished
Feb 2016