Comparison of Intermittent vs. Continuous Walking in MS
The Effect of Intermittent vs. Continuous Walking Training on Walking Endurance and Fatigue in People With Multiple Sclerosis: a Randomized, Crossover Trial.
What it found
We found no results in the registry or in papers.
This trial finished 11 years ago. We found no results in the registry or in any paper that cites it.
What was tested
Treatment tested
- type of walking
What it measured
Main measures
Pre to post change in 6 Minute walk test distance
4 weeks
Walking and mobility
Other measures (1)
Visual Analog Scale of fatigue
4 weeks
Fatigue
Who could take part
MS (type not specified) · 18 to 65
Show the full criteria
Inclusion criteria
* Positive diagnosis of MS * Ambulatory for at least 6 minutes with or without an assistive device (e.g. cane, crutches or orthotics) * Ability to read, understand, and sign an informed consent form
Exclusion criteria
* Evidence of exacerbation in the prior three months as defined by a treating physician * Orthopedic or cardiovascular condition that would interfere with ability to walk for 6 continuous minutes, * Currently being on an active physical rehabilitation program
As registered. Criteria can change, so ask the trial team or your neurologist.
About this trial
In the sponsor's words
Objective: To compare effects of an intermittent and continuous walking program on walking endurance and fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).A randomized crossover prospective method was used.The intervention consisted of eight 6-minute-long walks (2x/week for 4 weeks). The continuous condition consisted of 6 continuous minutes of walking. The intermittent condition consisted of three 2-minute bouts with 2-minute rests. After a 4-week detraining period, participants performed the second training condition.
Loading reviews and guidelines…
History
Started
Jan 2013
Main results due
Dec 2014
Finished
Dec 2014