A Feasibility Pilot Study on Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT)-Loud on Voice Intensity and Voice Use in Daily Living in People With Multiple Sclerosis: a Telerehabilitation Approach

CompletedNot a drug-phase studyMS (type not specified)NCT05930379

We could not find results for this trial

What it found

No results found

We found no results in the registry or in papers.

This trial finished 2 years ago. We found no results in the registry or in any paper that cites it.

What was tested

Treatment tested

  • LSVT-Loud delivered by telerehabilitation

Compared with

  • LSVT-Loud in the clinic

What it measured

Main measures

  • Change in the vocal Intensity during 1-minute monologue dB SPL

    Baseline, post-treatment (up to 4 weeks)

Other measures (5)

  • Change in the vocal Intensity during 1-minute monologue dB SPL

    follow-up (up to 6 months from the end of the treatment)

  • Change in sustained /a/ voice intensity (dB SPL/a/)

    Baseline, post-treatment (up to 4 weeks) and follow-up (up to 6 months from the end of treatment)

  • Change in the perception of voice as measured by the Voice Handicap Index (VHI, Jacobson et al., 1997)

    Baseline, post-treatment (up to 4 weeks) and follow-up (up to 6 months from the end of treatment

  • hange in perceived quality of life (especially in cognition, life activities, and participation domain) as measured by the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0; Federici et al., 2017)

    Baseline, post-treatment (up to 4 weeks) and follow-up (up to 6 months from the end of treatment

    Thinking and memoryWalking and mobilityQuality of life (reported by participants)
  • Protocol adherence

    post-treatment (up to 4 weeks)

    Quality of life (reported by participants)

Who could take part

MS (type not specified) · 18 to 85

Show the full criteria

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosis of MS according to the criteria of MC Donald 2010 (Polman et al., 2011; Thompson et al., 2018) * perceived voice intensity disability and severity of speech and voice disorder prior to treatment (as judged independently by two speech-language pathologists highly experienced with voice and motor speech disorders) * age ≥ 18; * not treated for hypophonia in the six months before enrollment in the study * with a preserved cognitive level at the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE test >24) (Folstein et al., 1975); * available and able to use a PC with an internet connection at home to access the telerehabilitation sessions; * agreeing to participate with the signature of the informed consent form; * stable drug treatment (last 3 months), if any; * absence of relapses (last month) before taking part in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* presence of dysphonia related to other diseases; * presence of other neurological disorders different from MS; * presence of major psychiatric conditions; * presence of severe impairment of visual and/or acoustic perception; * history of laryngeal cancer, radiotherapy, or head-neck trauma, or intubation.

As registered. Criteria can change, so ask the trial team or your neurologist.

About this trial

In the sponsor's words

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common causes of neurological disability in young adults. At least 62% of people with MS have speech, vocal, or communication disorders. Among these, alterations in voice intensity and quality constitute a limitation in MS people's social life leading to experience difficulties in work, conversations, and communication especially in noisy environments or through the telephone. Though voice and speech impairments and speech impairments are widely prevalent in this population, only 2% of the people receive speech therapy. The Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT)-Loud is a well-documented, efficacious intensive speech intervention, for treating hypophonia in subjects with neurological conditions. Despite the effectiveness of LSVT-Loud treatment on the voice has been reported in MS, several factors prevent the agile use of this method in rehabilitation centers: motor disability, work commitments, and distance barriers may preclude repeated attendance of this intervention at a healthcare facility. Telerehabilitation represents a feasible solution to bypass these potential barriers related to attendance at the rehabilitation programs in the clinic. The increasing evidence sustains the role of telerehabilitation for the migration of care from the clinic to the patient's homes, overcoming several obstacles affecting service accessibility. Previous studies showed the validity and the non-inferiority of LSVT-Loud delivered via telerehabilitation in subjects with Parkinson's Disease, while no pieces of evidence are still available on the efficacy of voice treatment delivered by telerehabilitation in MS. It is plausible to assume that LSVT-Loud delivered by telerehabilitation would be feasible and provide a beneficial effect also for MS non-inferior compared to the same treatment delivered in the clinic.

Papers

    Loading reviews and guidelines…

    History

      1. Started

        Jun 2023

      2. Main results due

        Sept 2024

      3. Finished

        Sept 2024

      Assembled by software from public sources.