Protective Role of Oxcarbazepine in Multiple Sclerosis
OxCarbazepine as a Neuroprotective Agent in MS: A Phase 2a Trial
What it found
We found no results in the registry or in papers.
This trial finished 8 years ago. We found no results in the registry or in any paper that cites it.
What was tested
Treatment tested
- Oxcarbazepine
Sodium channel alpha subunit blocker
Compared with
- Oxcarbazepine
Sodium channel alpha subunit blocker
Placebo
- Placebo
What it measured
Main measures
Relative reduction of CSF neurofilament light chain levels
From baseline to week 48
Blood or spinal fluid markersThe primary objective is to assess whether OxCbz has a neuroprotective effect in participants with early SP or stable RRMS with history of progression, as measured by the stabilization or decrease of CSF NFL levels.
Blood or spinal fluid markers
Other measures (6)
Safety of Oxcarbazepine in multiple sclerosis patients
Ongoing throughout the trial
SafetyRelative reduction of CSF neurofilament levels
baseline, 24 weeks and 48 weeks
Blood or spinal fluid markersChange in clinical outcome measured by neurological examination.
Baseline, week 24 and week 48
Disability progressionChange in clinical outcome measured by cognitive assessment
Baseline, week 12, 24, 36 and 48
Thinking and memoryChange in patient reported outcomes measured by questionnaires
Baseline, weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
FatigueWalking and mobilityPainQuality of life (reported by participants)Change over 48 weeks of the study using clinical outcome measures: EDSS 30, and the Questionnaires (Including SF36, MSWS, MSIS-29 v2, Patient Pain Assessment, Patient Fatigue Assessment) and neurocognitive tests such as single digit modalities test (SDMT.
Disability progressionThinking and memoryFatigueWalking and mobilityPainQuality of life (reported by participants)
Who could take part
MS (type not specified) · 18 to 60 · EDSS 3.5 to 6.0
Show the full criteria
Inclusion criteria
* A diagnosis of definite multiple sclerosis * Treatment with DMDs for at least 6 months prior to baseline visit* * CSF NFL level ≥ 0.380ng/mL * EDSS score between 3.5 and 6.0 * No history of relapses in the 6 months prior to the baseline visit * A history of slow progression of disability, objective or subjective, over a period of at least 6 months prior to baseline * Age 18-60 years * [Temporary interruption is permitted at the discretion of the investigator for a period of up to 8 weeks to prevent inflammatory MS reactivation. The cases where this could happen include for example switching DMDs that require a washout period as per clinical practice. When there are safety concerns, as in Lymphopenia or other side effects induced by the DMD, the interruption period can exceed 8 weeks as per clinical need. If reactivation of MS occurs with a relapse the investigator will assess if this meets withdrawal criteria 6.]
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnant or breastfeeding or unwilling to use adequate contraception.* * Participants with a diagnosis of primary progressive PP MS or primary relapsing PR MS. * A clinical relapse or pulsed intravenous or oral steroids in the 6 months preceding the baseline assessment. * Participants presenting with medical disorder deemed severe or unstable by the CI such as poorly controlled diabetes or arterial hypertension, severe cardiac insufficiency, unstable ischemic heart disease, abnormal liver function tests (>2.5 times ULN) and abnormal complete blood count (in particular leukopenia, as defined by a lymphocyte count \<500, neutrophil count \<1.5 or platelet count \<100, or thrombocytopenia \<1.5 LLN), or any medical condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, would pose additional risk to the participant. * Infection with hepatitis B or hepatitis C or human immunodeficiency virus. * Exposure to any other investigational drug within 30 days of enrolment in the study. * Judged clinically to have a suicidal risk in the opinion of the investigator based upon a clinical interview and the Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS). * Prior history of malignancy unless an exception is granted by the Investigator. * History of uncontrolled drug or alcohol abuse within 6 months prior to screening. * Past untoward reactions to OxCbz or Cbz * Participants receiving OxCbz or Cbz in the previous 12 weeks from baseline * [Adequate methods of contraception are non hormonal methods such as barrier methods, intrauterine devices, surgical sterilisation (undergone by the participant or their partner). Female participants using hormonal only forms of contraception will be required to use an additional barrier method. True abstinence can be considered an acceptable method of contraception when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods), declaration of abstinence for the duration of a trial, and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception. Non sexually active participants or those in same sex relationships will not be required to commence contraception.]
As registered. Criteria can change, so ask the trial team or your neurologist.
About this trial
In the sponsor's words
People with multiple sclerosis (MS) have nerve loss even without acute inflammatory relapses, as obvious in the progressive phase of disease. Drugs that may prevent nerve loss work better in earlier stages when it is difficult to measure progressive disability. But it is now possible to measure the nerve loss as neurofilament light (NFL) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). This is a trial of a neuroprotective drug, oxcarbazepine, which showed benefit in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. The investigators will use an innovative outcome, a reduction in the content of NFL in the CSF, as well as the usual clinical disability and imaging methods, to measure the success of the oxcarbazepine as a neuroprotective agent in MS. The use of NFL, a surrogate marker of neurodegeneration, allows a blinded and accurate outcome.
Papers
Background
Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, Rudick R, Mork S, Bo L. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 29;338(5):278-85. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801293380502.Background
Leray E, Yaouanq J, Le Page E, Coustans M, Laplaud D, Oger J, Edan G. Evidence for a two-stage disability progression in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2010 Jul;133(Pt 7):1900-13. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq076. Epub 2010 Apr 27.Background
Petzold A, de Boer JF, Schippling S, Vermersch P, Kardon R, Green A, Calabresi PA, Polman C. Optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2010 Sep;9(9):921-32. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70168-X.Background
Coles AJ, Cox A, Le Page E, Jones J, Trip SA, Deans J, Seaman S, Miller DH, Hale G, Waldmann H, Compston DA. The window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis: evidence from monoclonal antibody therapy. J Neurol. 2006 Jan;253(1):98-108. doi: 10.1007/s00415-005-0934-5. Epub 2005 Jul 27.Background
Franklin RJ, Ffrench-Constant C. Remyelination in the CNS: from biology to therapy. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Nov;9(11):839-55. doi: 10.1038/nrn2480.Background
Stys PK. General mechanisms of axonal damage and its prevention. J Neurol Sci. 2005 Jun 15;233(1-2):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2005.03.031.Background
Barkhof F, Calabresi PA, Miller DH, Reingold SC. Imaging outcomes for neuroprotection and repair in multiple sclerosis trials. Nat Rev Neurol. 2009 May;5(5):256-66. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.41.Background
Altmann DR, Jasperse B, Barkhof F, Beckmann K, Filippi M, Kappos LD, Molyneux P, Polman CH, Pozzilli C, Thompson AJ, Wagner K, Yousry TA, Miller DH. Sample sizes for brain atrophy outcomes in trials for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2009 Feb 17;72(7):595-601. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000335765.55346.fc. Epub 2008 Nov 12.Background
Kapoor R, Furby J, Hayton T, Smith KJ, Altmann DR, Brenner R, Chataway J, Hughes RA, Miller DH. Lamotrigine for neuroprotection in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Lancet Neurol. 2010 Jul;9(7):681-8. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70131-9. Epub 2010 Jun 8.Background
Ebers GC, Heigenhauser L, Daumer M, Lederer C, Noseworthy JH. Disability as an outcome in MS clinical trials. Neurology. 2008 Aug 26;71(9):624-31. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000313034.46883.16. Epub 2008 May 14.
Loading reviews and guidelines…
Related trials
- Cannabis (THC vs. CBD) in Multiple Sclerosis
Phase 2 · Recruiting
Still running
- ANTIBIOBONTA - Assessment of the interest of a peri-operative antibiot
Phase 3 · Not yet recruiting
Still running
- A study to asses the effects of Nabiximols on spasticity associated wi
Phase 3 · Completed
No results found
- Evaluation of the Effect of Nabiximols Oromucosal Spray on Clinical Me
Phase 3 · Stopped early
Stopped
- Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Nabiximols Oromucosal Spray on Clinica
Phase 3 · Completed
Missed its main goal
- Safety and Effectiveness of Nabiximols Oromucosal Spray as Add-on Ther
Phase 3 · Stopped early
Stopped
History
Started
Oct 2014
Main results due
Jan 2018
Finished
Jan 2018